Privacy Policy

 

Music
Modest
Musorgsky

Company
English National Opera

Conductor
Oleg Caetani

Director
Francesca
Zambello

Director
Julie Pevzner

Design
Alison Chitty

Lighting
Paul Pyant

Choreographer
Nicola Bowie

Translation
Carol
Borah Palca

Performers

Prince Ivan
Khovansky

Willard W White

Marfa
Jill Grove

Prince Andrey Khovansky
Tom Randle

Prince Vasily
Golitsyn

David Rendall

Shaklovity
Pavlo Hunka

Dosifey
John
Tomlinson

Susanna
Elizabeth
Sikora

Scribe
Robin
Leggate

Emma
Claire Weston

Kuzka
Andrew Rees

First Soldier
Paul
Napier-Burrows

Second Soldier
Christopher
Ross

 
London Coliseum
English National Opera

23 January - 13 February 2003
Khovanshchina is an opera fraught with problems. The first is what version to perform it in. Musorgsky did not live to orchestrate any but a small part of it, so it was initially orchestrated and finished off for performance by his friend Rimsky-Korsakov. By the time Rimsky came to do this, as he did for a number of the works of his dead or dying friends, his views had shifted from his early nationalist radicalism to a much lusher palette, so history and its critics has dealt rather scornfully with his completions and refinements of the many works to which he applied his new ideas. Perhaps history has misjudged Rimsky's good intentions, so in the case of Khovanshchina more hands have been involved including Stravinsky, Ravel and, more recently, Shostakovich who did his best to return to what seems to have been Musorgsky's style and intentions. His edition has now become the standard performing edition, but, given his contribution, the opera should really be billed as by Musorgsky and Shostakovich.
      The second problem is arguably harder to overcome.
Khovanshchina, in a sense, has no real story, it is more an evocation of a difficult transitional time in the epic history of Russia: the period of Peter the Great's transformations of Russian governance and society, the time of the symbolic of old Russia represented by Moscow to the new, more forward-seeking, Western-looking Russia symbolized by Peter's new city St. Petersburg. Old interests, beliefs and customs battled with new ideas and in between the people were caught in the transfer with frequent disastrous consequences. This would be a gripping historical narrative, but in opera it needs some more precise focus to allow the grander drama to emerge from the rather anonymous sweep of history. It also needs some partisanship; there need to be parties with whom the audience, through the music, must sympathise or despise. It needs characters and actions, and situations in which they find themselves.
     
Khovanshchina has characters and they are caught up in the sweep, but Musorgksy's pursuit of realism made him make the on-looking Russian people (the chorus) almost more prominent than the central characters whose downfall comes more from the tide of history being against them than any particular actions they take. Each character is a representative of his class or group. Only Dosifey, the Old Believer priest turns out to have been an aristocrat who offers Golitsyn and Khovansky a way forward from their current positions.
      Somehow, despite these reservations
Khovanshchina emerges as a mighty work, and despite its nearly four hours it is enthralling theatrical experience. This was brilliantly displayed in the superb English National Opera production, which first appeared in 1994 but which was revived on 23 January 2003.
      The production encourages 'larger-than-lifeness', and one example of this was the chorus. It is on top form, and despite the current pressures to reduce its size and its valiant efforts to stave off the artistically barbaric cuts with which it has been threatened, its forgot these in a wonderful display of choral power, acting and theatrical presence. Musorgsky intended the people to be at the centre of the drama and this chorus certainly showed they were.
      The orchestra also sounded as good as I have heard for a while. Under the sensitive, and much applauded (on stage, in pit and auditorium), baton of Oleg Caetani the drama evolved with measured pace articulated by some beautiful orchestral playing.
      Francesca Zambello's original production was supervised again by her and Julia Pevzner, and the passage of time shows this production to be undiminished.
      The most striking performance of the evening was by John Tomlinson as Dosifey, the leader of the Old Believers. Simultaneously compassionate and commanding, he strides around the stage with his magnificent beard and flowing robes adding majesty to his appearances. But as always with Tomlinson he has the voice to match the appearance. Clear diction and ringing tones made his performance focus the drama when he was on stage, and Musorgsky's fondness for folk-like melodic phrases seemed apt coming from Tomlinson's Dosifey (a role much associated with Chaliapin) Old Believer. He represents a die-hard reactionary move against changes, but he acts not from self-interest but from religious conviction. Unlike Moses he is forced to lead his people to an unpromised land where they do not want to go, and as such a tragic figure he emerges as a great operatic creation wonderfully portrayed by John Tomlinson.
      By contrast, but hardly less good were Willard White as Prince Khovansky and David Rendall as Prince Vasily Golitsyn. Both also are under threat from the emerging new order, though their responses are quite different. Golitsyn is an out-and-out aristocrat who despite having adopted Western manners and philosophies has not more respect for the Russian people than his more bullish, old-guard counterpart Khovansky a powerful boyars whose hold on power was the most threatened by Peter the Great's new order. Golitsyn is a strangely ambivalent character, who despite his modernity still has his fortune told by archaic magical means (a superbly atmospheric scene in this production) by the Old Believer Marfa. He gloomy predictions leads to him to punish the messenger, but he cannot forget the message. David Rendall's stocky tenor somehow seems just right for the would-be dandy who cannot shake off his unconscious roots in a past which his intellectual mind wants to dismiss. His is an anxious role that ends in exile, and the sense of frustration and doom runs throughout Rendall's apt portrayal.
      Willard's White's old boyar Khovansky is a brutal decadent, a kind of survivor from the grosser days of ancient Rome. Lust, greed and an familiarity with absolute power, whose retention he will stop at nothing to achieve, all conspire to make him a bad man on a big scale. Ironically Musorgsky should have made us side with the new brooms of Peter who is sweeping away Khovansky and his kind, but he does not, and in the end the Old Believers, who are the acceptable face of the old world, are just as much persecuted as Khovansky. Throughout the opera Musorgsky's realism led to a moral nihilism, a sense that new ideas will not improve the lot of anyone. From some points of view this might mean our interpretation of Khovansky's immorality and brutality was softened. But somehow both Musorgsky and White's interpretation of the role make Khovansky more than just a historical phase. White with his wonderful diction and stage-presence injects a continual sense of menace into the role, and despite his nervous fingering of his bath-towel in the orgy scene he is enjoying before he is murdered by Peter's ominous agent Shaklovity, he never lets the audience doubt his political realism and determination to go down fighting for the world he has appallingly enjoyed.
      Shaklovity is another ambivalent character. As Peter's lieutenant he is staunch in his pursuit of non-reformers. He has an evangelical mission, perhaps adopted however for opportunistic reasons. But in a moment of reflection he laments the chaos the changes have brought in their wake, and the agony of the new world's emergence from the old. He is strongly (vocally and visually) presented on stage by Pavlo Hunka as a typical hard-line henchman with resonances from Berlin to the Kremlin in the twentieth century.
      Jill Grove's portrayal of the hapless Marfa, a typical figure from ancient Russia, who is both a fortune-teller and much persecuted philanthrope, captures both Marfa's perpetual defensive and her compassion. Her gravelly voice prevents Marfa's seeming to be too young or one of the fly-by-nights such as Emma (sung by Claire Weston) in the first scene. As the only major female role in this primarily male epic Jill Grove makes Marfa's presence felt compellingly throughout the opera not only as herself but the for down-trodden, ill-fated group she represents.
      This production, both as a spectacle and as a musical experience must be seen and heard. It is the English National Opera at its best with an intelligent and forceful production allowing some superb portrayals of larger-than-life characters by singing actors rather than just opera-singers.
Khovanshchina is not that often staged, so this should lend urgency to one's desire to see this very striking performance.
Roderick Swanston

Modest Musorgsky
Khovanshchina
English National Opera