Privacy Policy

 

Music
Leo Delibe

Choreographer
Frederick Ashton

Design
Robin Ironside

Design
Christopher Ironside

Lighting
Mark Jonathan

Conductor
Paul Murphy

Conductor
Graham Bond

4 | 10 | 16 Nov
| 3 Dec

Darcey Bussell
Jonathan Cope
Thiago Soares

5 | 11 | 24
| 29 Nov

Zenaida Yanowsky
David Makhateli
Gary Avis

9 Nov | 20 Nov
| 1 Dec

Marianela Nunez
Rupert Pennefather
Viacheslav Samodurov

 
The Royal Ballet
Covent Garden

4 November - 3 December 2004
Reconstructing 'Sylvia' to mark Frederick Ashton's centenary (1904-88) cannot have been an easy task for Christopher Newton. The three-act ballet, Ashton's second full-length work after 'Cinderella', was only partially recorded in the Royal Ballet's film archive and until the discovery of 'primitive' (Newton's word) celluloid footage showing a 1965 rehearsal, reliance on dancers' memories and archival clips formed the basis of interpretation. But the sketchiness of records is surely not what proved problematic. The issue was, and is, whether 'Sylvia' worked as a full-length ballet to begin with. Its original conception as a showcase for Margot Fonteyn, then at the height of her success, resulted in a top-heavy structure, which, whilst concentrating on patches of excellence neglected the ballet as a whole. In response to criticism, Ashton reduced 'Sylvia' to one act in 1967. This revival by the Royal Ballet thus attempts not merely a restoration of the three-act form but a critical exercise of refinement within the form, an attainment Ashton himself failed to realise.
      That the majority of narrative is relayed in Act I is perhaps the reason for the initial structural dilemma, since the problematic second act least satisfied Ashton. Act I, based on Tasso's story, tells of Sylvia, a chaste nymph who mocks the statue of Eros. Whilst she does so she is watched by the shepherd Aminta and hunter Orion. Aminta is discovered and declares his love. Sylvia blames Eros, the god of love, and raises her bow and arrow to strike the statue. Aminta shields the statue but is mortally wounded. Eros thereupon strikes Sylvia with his arrow, causing her to fall in love with Aminta. Before she knows that Eros has revived Aminta, however, Sylvia is carried off by Orion. If it is the place of the third act to effect resolution in the lovers' union, all that is left for Act II is filling out Sylvia's escape from Orion's island cave, and 'filling' describes much of Newton's embellishment here. Perhaps it was his aim to answer the charge made by Ashton's critics that the subject of Tasso's tale is anachronistic, since one can certainly find the relevance to a modern audience of a character defined only by stereotypical Eastern dress, like a pantomime baddie, taking an opportunity to humiliate the martial and haughty Sylvia, in her white neo-classical garb. It is not the quality of the dancing that fails to satisfy; Viacheslav Samodurov's Orion twists and jumps with consistently grounded force, his arms always coming through centre before giving a pressured push to the ground in a motion that perfectly articulates fundamental belief and razing power. Similarly, Marianela Nunez captures the initial arrogance of her character, expressing it in the snap-back of torso over hips during a jump, as though there is something a little too pertly executed in Sylvia's prowess. This gives way to a quality of movement in Acts II and III that, though equally concise and pointed, is less curt, more fluid. The troubling aspect of Act II is simply that it is too short to justify the second interval; its action is static, centred on Orion and his cohorts (all snakey motion and tambourines) in their Aladdin's Cave.
      The emphasis placed on Ashton's choreography by the centenary creates an additional responsibility to interpret and define the flavour of Ashton's style, that it might be communicable to an audience more familiar with choreography by the Cunningham-Graham-Bausch generation. Perhaps there were lingering concerns that 'Sylvia' might appear dated to a modern audience, that it is indeed anachronistic, for Newton s firm placement of Ashton's style in the tradition of nineteenth century ballet d'action as it emerged with Georges Noverre and Enlightenment France, ensures that a modern audience will readily understand the pantomimic elements of this tradition. As Noverre's contemporary, the critic de Mericourt, put it 'Transform comedies, pastorals, farces even into pantomimes a action; announce a series of scenes from Astraea, Ariosto, Tasso, and you will not have an empty house.'
      'Sylvia' does have the reliance on set-gestures and 'dumb-show' that characterised nineteenth century theatre but the choreography of Act II, in aiming to draw out precisely what a modern audience might find familiar in Ashton's style, has gone too far towards pantomime. Ashton's wit, expressed in the movement he created, was sharp and cleanly cutting, as in 'A Tragedy of Fashion', but Act II fails to find the right balance between the pantomimic elements of ballet d'action and the precise, neat, academic movement and wit that Ashton so perfectly understood in the French tradition. As if aware of the lack, Newton resolves the stasis of Act II by adding a spectacular transformation scene in which winged Mercury appears with a boat as the scenery melts away. It is a wonderfully theatrical moment but only serves as a coda to the previously dragging scene.
      The overall impression is that 'Sylvia' would work well in two acts. Acts I and III never fail to combine pantomimic humour with refined footwork and precision in the upper body. This is performed well, for example, by Eros in disguise (Act I), hunched over but managing to express a camp humour through the action of his feet, and by the corps in Act III where the emphasis is on neat footwork with accompanying precision in the arms. There is a perfect fit in this between Delibes' score and Ashton's choreography; both are whimsical and pursed, with a technicolour patina.
      It is Rupert Pennefather as Aminta, however, who truly embodies the precision of the Ashton style, partly because there is a recurring phrase in Aminta's solo that refers to the shape made by an arm that has just released an arrow from a bow. Throughout 'Sylvia' the bow and arrow serves Ashton well as a metaphor for the principle of classical ballet in which contradictory forces counter each other like two hands drawing apart from a centre-point, maintaing a taut line that is expressed in the moment of release. Pennefather's impressive performance, at once gravid and light with a sense of power in store, marks him out as a rising star of the Royal Ballet.
      The production is a success in terms of sheer visual virtosity, from the dancers to the scenery (an Ironside pastiche that gives a nod to Poussin's blind Orion). The Neo-Classical costume and set design give the production coherence but the overall integrity is compromised by the decision to use the three-act structure, with the concomitant sag in the middle revived only by smoke and special effects.
      The second act and interval make room for the grand gestures that are easily digestible and ensure a full house but breaking Sylvia up into three acts ‚ or 'bite-sized ballet' as I overheard one audience member describe it ‚ satisfies only those who ask that culture be easily consumed.

L. M. Keynes

Royal Opera House
Frederick Ashton