Privacy Policy

 

Author
David Mamet

Director
Matthew Warchus

Design
Rob Howell

Lighting
Paul Pyant

Charlie Fox
Kevin Spacey

Bobby Gould
Jeff Goldblum

Karen
Laura Michelle Kelly

 
The Old Vic
1 Feb - 26 Apr 08
'Life in the movie business', says Charlie Fox, a Hollywood script-writer, 'is like the beginning of a new love affair: it's full of surprises, and you're constantly getting fucked.'
      For him and his buddy film producer Bob Gould, "fucking" mainly has the metaphorical meaning of "subordinating", "humiliating", "destroying". But it is Gould's literal fucking of his temporary secretary, Karen, that threatens to destroy the two men's futures, which are tantalisingly on the brink of wealth and fame. For in one night (the night after a big, box-office Hollywood star has asked to do Fox's script, and Fox has offered to co-produce it with Gould), Karen manages to persuade Gould to film a book about God, fear, the human condition and the end of the world instead. The last of the three acts shows Karen and Charlie Fox battling for Gould's soul before the scheduled meeting with the man upstairs who has the power to 'greenlight' either film.
      Mamet's play, originally produced in 1988, has often featured big, box-office stars itself - Madonna in the first production on Broadway, Jeff Goldblum and Kevin Spacey in this production at the Old Vic. And if the conversion of such a cynical, worldly man as Bob Gould in only one night seems improbable, that improbability simply echoes the hundred and one implausibly swift conversions and redemptions of a hundred and one Hollywood films - or, for that matter, of many plays which (like this one) preserve the Unity of twenty-four hours. But Mamet manages to disconcert us. He sets up a situation which seems designed to follow neat, predictable Hollywood conventions and to cater to a Hollywood audience's smug expectations, and then breaks the rules. Where a film with James Stuart or Morgan Freeman would feature probity versus corruption, here all the protagonists seem to have impure, self-interested motives (in fact we are never quite sure of Karen's), so that it is not the usual dichotymy between good and bad, integrity versus shallowness, just a matter of different sorts of corruption and inauthenticity struggling against one another. Nor can we, setting aside the impurity of motives, see it (which we are set up to do) as a battle to promote soul-searching art (the book Karen wants to have filmed) rather than tawdry dross (Fox's script). Script and book are merely two different sorts of dross - one, degrading sex-and-violence; the other, pretentious, purportedly-spiritual gobbledigook.
       In this Old Vic production, Jeff Goldblum and Kevin Spacey have the buddy schtick to perfection. But ironically, an anti-Hollywood play is itself hijacked by the Hollywood factor. It is because there are two big Hollywood stars in the male roles that the production has been so massively attended, and it perhaps puts too much emphasis on the scenes between Goldblum and Spacey at the expense of the middle act. But it is this middle act, a two-hander between Bob Gould and his temp, which is so crucial. Speed-the-Plow is in a way less a play than a possible-film which the characters are consciously creating and enacting around the two possible films they are disputing about. Producer and temp are alike convinced, or have convinced themselves and one another, that, in the traditional Hollywood way, she, and the filming of the portentous book, can redeem him from cynicism, fear and exploitativeness. They share a schmaltzy belief in redemption, the 'fear' about life that Karen talks of, the hope to 'find something', to be given a message, to pick up that life-changing book - in an inn or a bookshop, the dread of being 'punished'. They are both superstitious in a self-aggrandising way, assuming that they were 'put here' for some purpose, 'called' to their present positions, that there must be 'a reason' for their lives, their actions, his promotion, their meeting. But Goldblum doesn't convey this, doesn't communicate the hope, fear, desire for salvation and meaning which are so essential to the character he plays. Although he gives a brilliantly well-honed star-turn with Kevin Spacey, his scene with Karen is weak. And unfortunately
Speed-the-Plow does not work properly unless we believe that, although Bob's motives in getting Karen to his house were mere lust and bravado, he is actually swept away by her enthusiasm, and beguiled by the feeling that she can save him. Otherwise the play remains at the level of a skilled but superficial masque.
Jane O'Grady

 David Mamet
 'Speed-The-Plow'
 The Old Vic